Elizabeth Ruelas Books

New and used online bookstore. Fast delivery.

Ayn Rand

with 2 comments

Ayn Rand

Rational Christian Answer To Ayn Rand

As a Christian I wish to respond to Ayn Rand’s self-centered philosophy and her so-called arguments, which she claims are rational, against Christian altruism. I am thoroughly familiar with Ayn Rand’s philosophy, but she misunderstands and misapplies certain Christian teachings. We shall examine these and other points in this article. No doubt, Ayn Rand would be totally correct in her “Objectivist” philosophy if Darwinian macro-evolutionary theory were, indeed, scientifically valid and true.

The actual and objective scientific evidence, however, shows that there are natural limits to evolution in nature and that we are not here by chance or by macro-evolutionary processes. Natural selection in nature is not a creative force as many think. Natural selection can only “select” from biological variations that are produced and that have survival value. The real issue is what biological variations are naturally possible.

Genetic information, like any other information, doesn’t happen by chance. Therefore, it’s far more logical and rational to believe that the genetic similarities between all forms of life are because of a common Designer or Genetic Engineer (God) Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in all the various forms of life.

Micro-evolution, or variations within a biological kind such as the varieties of dogs, cats, horses, and cows, is science but not macro-evolution. Macro-evolution, variations across kinds, is not science but faith.

The genes exist in all species for micro-evolution but not for macro-evolution, and there is no scientific evidence that random genetic mutations caused by natural forces such as radiation can or will generate entirely new genes for entirely new traits.

Another problem for macro-evolution is the issue of survival of the fittest. How can a partially evolved species be fit for survival? A partially evolved trait or organ that is not completely one or the other will be a liability to a species, not a survival asset.

No one has shown that DNA can come into existence by chance! It takes DNA to get DNA! In other words, there must already exist DNA in nature to direct the formation of more DNA.

The mathematical odds of even the simplest DNA molecule coming into existence by chance is comparable to a monkey typing the sequence of all the letters and words in a dictionary by randomly hitting keys on a computer keyboard.

Regarding protein molecules, it is has been shown that some individual amino acid molecules making-up proteins can come into existence by chance. But, it has never been shown that the various individual amino acid molecules can come together into a precise sequence by chance to form protein molecules.

Besides all this, none of these molecules can exist for long outside of an already complete and living cell! In other words, the cell could not have gradually evolved. (Please read author’s essay The Natural Limits of Evolution at his website, www.religionscience.com, for a comprehensive and in-depth scientific analysis and discussion of this issue).

There is a God to Whom Ayn Rand and all of us must give an account. God is not being egotistical. Truth demands that God be the center of our lives.

Ayn Rand misunderstands the concept of Christian altruism and the proper context in which Christian altruism is to be applied. Christian altruism does not mean that we should give to others unconditionally in all circumstances because that would not be for the true benefit of others. Christian love seeks what is for the true benefit of others, not whatever they desire or want. For example, the Bible teaches that a person who is not willing to work should not eat. Therefore, feeding such a person is wrong since it would only be helping to increase the selfishness of such a person.

There is a difference between selfness and selfishness. The first involves proper Biblical love and care for oneself as God intends. The latter is based on ego and pride. Christianity is not against legitimate self-interest. We are created in God’s image so, of course, God would want us to love ourselves as well as to love others.

Ayn Rand rightly claims that “A” cannot be “non A” but she misapplies this principle in her critique of Christianity. For example, when Christ said that “the first shall be last and the last shall be first” there is no true contradiction (i.e. “A” being “non A”), as Ayn Rand claims, because the both cases in which the words “first” and “last” are used within the context of the passage have different applications and reasons for usage. Jesus was simply saying that in this world a person is considered “first” or “last” for different reasons than why a person is considered “first” or “last” in God’s kingdom. Again, there is no real contradiction (i.e. there is no “A” equated with “non A”).

According to Christian teaching, the individual (the “self”) is not an end to itself but rather the “self” is a means to an end – that end being to live for God and to please Him and to do His will. Part of living for God is to do good for ourselves as well as for others because we belong to God and are owned by Him.

Christianity is not against the enjoyment of material things; it is against the worship of material things. God alone is worthy of worship! The Bible does not teach that money itself is the root of all evil but rather the Bible teaches that it is “the love of money which is the root of all evil.”

God is glorified when His creatures enjoy the provisions, bounty, and wealth that He provides, but if it is God’s will and purpose in a particular case for an individual to give up all that he has and to give it to the poor then it is only right that the individual do so. After all, everything belongs to God, even the wealth a person gains in this life for nothing would be possible without God’s power and undeserving grace.

Contrary to popular belief, Jesus was not against self-defense in all cases. “Turning the other cheek” simply means that Christians should not retaliate against personal insults by returning insults. “Slapping another’s cheek” in Jewish culture was considered a figure of speech for throwing verbal insult at someone. Jesus, in fact, allowed His disciples to carry swords for self-defense. This is why Peter pulled out a sword to protect Jesus at the time of His arrest. However, Jesus told Peter to put away the sword because it was the Father’s will at that time for Christ to be delivered to suffering and death in order to pay for the sins of the world.

There is nothing wrong with capitalism or making a profit. What is evil is when profits are made without any sense of obligation and duty to God and His commandments. It is God Who enables the capitalist to make money and it is God who requires the capitalist to have due and proper concern for his fellowman’s health and welfare. Profits made at the expense of God’s commandments are an abomination to the Creator and society. CEOs take notice! My fellow conservatives and Republicans take notice!

The above are just some of the Christian arguments refuting Ayn Rand’s philosophy

About the Author

The author, Babu G. Ranganathan, is an experienced Christian writer. He has his B.A. with academic concentrations in Bible and Biology. As a religion and science writer he has been recognized in the 24th edition of Marquis Who’s Who In The East. The author has a website at: www.religionscience.com

Ayn Rand – Liberty vs Socialism

eBay Logo  

Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand (1999, Paperback)


Feminist Interpretations of Ayn Rand (1999, Paperback)


$51.28


Ayn Rand-we the living-1959


Ayn Rand-we the living-1959


$4.99


Lot 5 Ayn Rand pbs Anthem Atlas Shrugged Fountainhead +


Lot 5 Ayn Rand pbs Anthem Atlas Shrugged Fountainhead +


$22.02


AYN RAND - DOCUMENT SIGNED 06/12/1976


AYN RAND – DOCUMENT SIGNED 06/12/1976


$19,999.00


AYN RAND - TYPED LETTER SIGNED 09/25/1950


AYN RAND – TYPED LETTER SIGNED 09/25/1950


$15,999.00


Author Ayn Rand Chatting with Admirers at National Book Awards Premium Photographic Poster Print


Author Ayn Rand Chatting with Admirers at National Book Awards Premium Photographic Poster Print



Author Ayn Rand Chatting with Admirers at National Book Awards is digitally printed on archival photographic paper resulting in vivid, pure color and exceptional detail that is suitable for any museum or gallery display. Finding that perfect piece to match your interest and style is easy and within your budget!…


Historic Print (S): [Ayn Rand, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left] / Ben Pinchot, N.Y.


Historic Print (S): [Ayn Rand, head-and-shoulders portrait, facing left] / Ben Pinchot, N.Y.


$24.95


This is a museum quality, reproduction print on premium paper with archival/UV resistant inks. Date: 1 photographic print.Subject: 95513140Notes: 1930Format: SOURCE: Library of Congress…

Who is John Galt? / Atlas Will Shrug Mug


Who is John Galt? / Atlas Will Shrug Mug


$15.95


“Who is John Galt?” on one side and “Atlas Will Shrug” on the other….

Gary Cooper - The Signature Collection (Sergeant York / The Fountainhead / Dallas / Springfield Rifle / The Wreck of the Mary Deare)


Gary Cooper – The Signature Collection (Sergeant York / The Fountainhead / Dallas / Springfield Rifle / The Wreck of the Mary Deare)


$24.98


Springfield Rifle, one of five films included in this set, may miss the bullseye as a true Gary Cooper classic, but there’s a line that speaks to his enduring status as a screen icon and “American Legend.” In this 1952 Western, his follow-up film to High Noon, Cooper’s character has been drummed out of the army and branded a coward. Suffice to say that all is not what it seems, and an observer is …

Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life


Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life


$16.99


Music, narration and dialogue from the original motion picture soundtrack of the Oscar nominated feature documentary, AYN RAND: A SENSE OF LIFE. Original score composed by Jeff Britting with narration excerpts by Sharon Gless. Also included are dialogue excerpts from Ayn Rand’s play, IDEAL, performed by Janne Peters and a rare archival recording of Ayn Rand’s testimony before the House Committee o…

2 Responses to 'Ayn Rand'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Ayn Rand'.

  1. Of course, self-centeredness must be selfish, not thinking of anything other than self. However, if you look at Howard Roark’s jury summation, you see where he loved his art, and in the story, a woman. In Atlas Shrugged, Rand used James Jerome Hill as her Taggart model, and he must have thought out of himself to create such a great railroad. So, do you mean that anyone who pursues a dream, aspirations, self-interest, living out of the community herd, is just a selfish beast who needs to reigned in so he won’t disturb the herd? Did Jesus discourage people from using what God had given them, or to simply look to Him as their savior and guide? Hmmm. claysamerica.com

    clay barham

    24 Feb 10 at 9:33 am

  2. It is not necessary to prove either the existence of God or evolution to derive a rational reality based ethics. One needs only to define what man is by nature — the nature that is identical among us all. Regardless of how we came to be what we are, we are what we are, and that is the base of rational egoism.

    That man, unlike other animals, survives and thrives by volitionally chosen applications of reason to action is a fact. That the most fundamental alternative faced in the process of life is whether to pursue one’s continued existence or not — the alternative of life or death — is another fact. To choose life over death implicitly establishes one’s life as the goal and standard of all values that must be pursued in its service. That which contributes to one’s life consistent with one’s nature over the long run is the good. That which does not is evil. Voila! Egoism.

    Altruism inverts the choice and is in every instance a pursuit to one degree or another of death. The existence of a God does not alter these facts. One is still what one is whether created or evolved.

    MichaelM

    24 Feb 10 at 4:01 pm

Leave a Reply